| 
         
         
        Number
        67: September 1, 2004 
        
 If you think your friends and colleagues would enjoy this newsletter
        feel free to forward it to them. If  someone
 sent this to you,  
 
 today. Outlook 2003 and AOL 9 users, please add us to your trusted or buddy lists, so you won't miss an issue. 
        This week in Katydid:
        
        The
        Department of Intelligence 
        In many organizations, Sales & Marketing feels more like Sales v.
        Marketing. This has less to do with the competitiveness or competence of
        either group, and more to do with incentives and influence over the
        process.
         
        For example, recently I had lunch with a marketing colleague who had
        left her promising corporate career for a more promising (and
        fulfilling) career as an independent. Like many of us, she was not
        running away from a bad scene, she was leaving to make better use of her
        skills. 
        Of course, there were politics and infighting as you have with any
        organization. However, she had endured worse environments. It wasn't
        money or stability, because those are hardly guaranteed in freelance
        consulting. She had a complex mix of reasons, but one factor was that
        she wasn't getting to do marketing at all. 
        The definition
        of marketing according to the American Heritage Dictionary
        is, 
        
          1. The act or process of buying and selling in a market. 2. The
          commercial functions involved in transferring goods from producer to
          consumer. 
         
        That definition makes clear that marketers can't divorce themselves
        from sales. You can find evidence of the tight connection in your own
        job titles, many of which are V.P. or Director of Sales & Marketing.
        These organizations measure marketing's success by lead generation and
        may even tie bonuses to the conversion of leads. 
        According the American Marketing Association, 
        
          "Marketing
          is the process of planning and executing the conception, pricing,
          promotion, and distribution of ideas, goods, and services to create
          exchanges that satisfy individual and organizational objectives." 
         
        This suggests a strategic
        role for the marketer, but you have to consider that marketers wrote
        this definition. You won't find the word 'sales' in there at all. You
        can label this distancing from sales as many things  arrogance, envy,
        frustration  but blaming others is just a way to distance oneself from
        the more proximate cause: the inability to do one's own job well. 
        I'm going to emphasize that I used the word 'inability' rather than
        'incapacity.' The ability to market well depends on how the organization
        supports and incents marketing. Sales are a perfectly acceptable measure
        of marketing's success, if marketing has influence in the development of
        the market. 
        As a marketer, you can't be successful if you're handed a product and
        told to provide a list of warm leads to sales. In that position, all a
        marketer can do is find the low-hanging fruit  the easy pickings.
        That's something a good sales team could do, if they weren't so busy
        already. In this role, marketing becomes the SLQ team for sales. At some
        point, however, those low branches are stripped bare. 
        In this circumstance, you can see why marketing would not want their
        performance tracked to sales. They know they can't be successful in the
        long term, because they have no more influence over the process than
        sales does. In fact, they have less because they can't control the
        quality of the sales staff. This is what I mean by the inability to do
        one's job well. 
        Put into another context, marketing is about intelligence. Marketers
        gather and analyze data about your market. This information is valuable
        not just to sales, but also to product development, finance, customer
        service, and every other department in your organization. Marketers are
        number crunchers as well as field operatives. 
        Developing intelligence is an iterative process. Everything you learn
        is fed back into the system in order for you to learn more. This
        feedback loop means the system already is tuned to change. You will
        discover trends and be able to respond to them. If one pipeline goes
        dry, you have the ability to find the next one. 
        While gathering, testing, and analyzing all seem like passive roles
        as our culture defines them, they provide information that organizations
        can act on. Since strategy is a plan for choices, you can execute
        strategy only if you know what choices you have. Marketing tells you
        what your options are. 
        Some organizations feel that they already know about their markets.
        The C-level team came up through the ranks of their market and they are
        familiar with those pains. I call this 'Intuition Marketing,' but it's
        about going into battle with old intelligence. It's like saying,
        "The enemy stronghold is on that hill, it's always been on that
        hill. Let's attack that hill," when the enemy has already moved
        behind you. 
        If you want to know if you're acting on strong intelligence, you need
        look no further than your own messaging. If your copy is vague and
        conditional, then you have faulty intelligence. If you see a lot of
        cliché's and generalizations, your strategy is not based on real
        information. If your content looks and sounds exactly like your
        competitors' content, you're using the same intelligence. 
        Give marketers the role of intelligence officers within your
        organization, and you will make every department run more efficiently
        because they will have stronger strategy. Product knows whom they are
        building for and what they will buy. Finance knows what price the market
        will support and where there is room for profit. Sales knows that the
        product and the customer make a perfect match, and they know what that
        is worth to the customer. And Marketing has no concerns about providing
        leads because they know there's more where those came from. 
        Marketing makes clear how every department contributes to sales. With
        that information, nobody minds taking credit (or earning bonuses) based
        on sales or revenue. Just don't tell sales; it boosts their confidence
        to think they're doing it on their own. 
        Top » 
        Thanks for Reading 
        This e-mail newsletter spreads mainly by word of
        mouth. Please send it on to your colleagues. Also, you can
        read other back issues. 
        If you have suggestions of web sites to review, writing that buzzes,
        or a new way of looking at things, let me know. Send your suggestions to
        
. 
        If you received this newsletter from a friend, please 
        today. Our subscriber lists are confidential; we never sell or rent our
        lists to third parties. If you want to 
from this newsletter,
        please let us know. 
        Kind regards,  
 Kevin Troy Darling 
 Top » 
               |